Quetta Gladiators vs Islamabad United, 10th Match, Cricket Score

Pakistan Super League, 202203 Feb 2022, Thur, 8:00 PM IST

Result

186/10 (19.3 ov)

229/4 (20 ov)

IU won by 43 runs.

Date03 Feb 2022, Thur, 8:00 PM IST

LocationNational Stadium

TossQuetta Gladiators won the toss & elected to field

UmpiresFaisal Afridi (Pakistan), Richard Illingworth (England), Shozab Raza (Pakistan, TV)

Match RefereeRanjan Madugalle (Sri Lanka)

Team Form (Last 5 matches)

Head to Head(Last 10 matches)

Islamabad United vs Quetta Gladiators

Diamond Oval, KimberleyQualifier 1

QTG
QTG

209/6 (20 ov)

IU
IU

179/10 (19.4 ov)

QTG won by 30 runs

Islamabad United vs Quetta Gladiators

Diamond Oval, KimberleyMatch 26

QTG
QTG

263/3 (20 ov)

IU
IU

154/10 (19.3 ov)

QTG won by 109 runs

Quetta Gladiators vs Islamabad United

Diamond Oval, KimberleyMatch 23

QTG
QTG

159/8 (19.5 ov)

IU
IU

157/9 (20 ov)

QTG won by 2 wickets

Islamabad United vs Quetta Gladiators

Diamond Oval, KimberleyEliminator 1 (3 v 4)

QTG
QTG

135/10 (18.4 ov)

IU
IU

174/9 (20 ov)

IU won by 39 runs.

Islamabad United vs Quetta Gladiators

Diamond Oval, Kimberley8th Match

QTG
QTG

139/7 (18.2 ov)

IU
IU

138/9 (20 ov)

QTG won by 3 wickets

Islamabad United vs Quetta Gladiators

Diamond Oval, Kimberley21st Match

QTG
QTG

179/6 (20 ov)

IU
IU

183/8 (19.3 ov)

IU won by 2 wickets

Quetta Gladiators vs Islamabad United

Diamond Oval, Kimberley13th Match

QTG
QTG

157/10 (19.1 ov)

IU
IU

220/6 (20 ov)

IU won by 63 runs.

Islamabad United vs Quetta Gladiators

Diamond Oval, Kimberley18th Match

QTG
QTG

203/5 (19.4 ov)

IU
IU

199/8 (20 ov)

QTG won by 5 wickets

Quetta Gladiators vs Islamabad United

Diamond Oval, Kimberley10th Match

QTG
QTG

186/10 (19.3 ov)

IU
IU

229/4 (20 ov)

IU won by 43 runs.

Islamabad United vs Quetta Gladiators

Diamond Oval, KimberleyMatch 18

QTG
QTG

133/10 (20 ov)

IU
IU

137/0 (10 ov)

IU won by 10 wickets

Team Comparison (Last 10 matches)

QTG

vs all teams

IU

vs all teams

10

Matches Played

10

70.00%

Win %

40.00%

169

Average Score

161

Highest Score

Lowest Score

What are you looking for?

Loading...

Loading...