Quetta Gladiators vs Lahore Qalandars, 15th Match, Cricket Score

Pakistan Super League, 2022

Result

207/3 (19.3 ov)

204/5 (20 ov)

QTG won by 7 wickets

Date07 Feb 2022, Mon, 8:00 PM IST

LocationNational Stadium

TossQuetta Gladiators won the toss & elected to field

UmpiresAleem Dar (Pakistan), Michael Gough (England), Shozab Raza (Pakistan, TV)

Match RefereeIftikhar Ahmed (Pakistan)

Team Form (Last 5 matches)

Head to Head(Last 10 matches)

Quetta Gladiators vs Lahore Qalandars

Diamond Oval, KimberleyFinal

QTG
QTG

201/9 (20 ov)

LHQ
LHQ

204/4 (19.5 ov)

LHQ won by 6 wickets

Quetta Gladiators vs Lahore Qalandars

Diamond Oval, KimberleyMatch 4

QTG
QTG

140/10 (16.2 ov)

LHQ
LHQ

219/6 (20 ov)

LHQ won by 79 runs

Lahore Qalandars vs Quetta Gladiators

Diamond Oval, Kimberley28th Match

QTG
QTG

169/4 (20 ov)

LHQ
LHQ

166/4 (20 ov)

QTG won by 6 wickets

Lahore Qalandars vs Quetta Gladiators

Diamond Oval, Kimberley4th Match

QTG
QTG

188/5 (19.1 ov)

LHQ
LHQ

187/7 (20 ov)

QTG won by 5 wickets

Lahore Qalandars vs Quetta Gladiators

Diamond Oval, Kimberley18th Match

QTG
QTG

131/7 (20 ov)

LHQ
LHQ

148/10 (19.2 ov)

LHQ won by 17 runs.

Quetta Gladiators vs Lahore Qalandars

Diamond Oval, Kimberley10th Match

QTG
QTG

135/8 (20 ov)

LHQ
LHQ

198/6 (20 ov)

LHQ won by 63 runs.

Lahore Qalandars vs Quetta Gladiators

Diamond Oval, Kimberley20th Match

QTG
QTG

141/7 (20 ov)

LHQ
LHQ

143/2 (17.4 ov)

LHQ won by 8 wickets

Quetta Gladiators vs Lahore Qalandars

Diamond Oval, Kimberley15th Match

QTG
QTG

207/3 (19.3 ov)

LHQ
LHQ

204/5 (20 ov)

QTG won by 7 wickets

Quetta Gladiators vs Lahore Qalandars

Diamond Oval, KimberleyMatch 23

QTG
QTG

158/5 (20 ov)

LHQ
LHQ

140/10 (18 ov)

QTG won by 18 runs.

Lahore Qalandars vs Quetta Gladiators

Diamond Oval, Kimberley4th Match

QTG
QTG

178/6 (20 ov)

LHQ
LHQ

179/1 (18.2 ov)

LHQ won by 9 wickets

Team Comparison (Last 10 matches)

QTG

vs all teams

LHQ

vs all teams

10

Matches Played

10

70.00%

Win %

70.00%

169

Average Score

182

263

Highest Score

209

90

Lowest Score

129

What are you looking for?

Loading...

Loading...