logologo
Get App

Birmingham Bears vs Gloucestershire, Central Group, Cricket Score

Vitality Blast, 2020

Result

WAS
WAS

100/10 (11.1 ov)

GLO
GLO

157/3 (12 ov)

Gloucs won by 57 runs

infoscorecardpoints table

Central Group

Vitality Blast

Date02 Sep 2020, Wed, 11:05 PM IST

LocationEdgbaston

Toss-

UmpiresTom Lungley (England, TV), Russell Warren (England), Paul Baldwin (England)

Match RefereeWill Smith (England)

Team Form (Last 5 matches)

user

Warwickshire

L
W
L
W
W
user

Gloucestershire

L
L
L
L
L

Head to Head(Last 9 matches)

iccWAS
4-5
iccGLO
Warwickshire vs Gloucestershire

Diamond Oval, Kimberley4th Quarter Final

WAS
WAS

124/9 (20 ov)

GLO
GLO

138/10 (19.2 ov)

GLO won by 14 runs.

Gloucestershire vs Warwickshire

Diamond Oval, KimberleyGroup B

WAS
WAS

271/4 (47.5 ov)

GLO
GLO

267/10 (49.4 ov)

WAS won by 6 wickets

Warwickshire vs Gloucestershire

Diamond Oval, KimberleyGroup B

WAS
WAS

123/2 (25.5 ov)

GLO
GLO

120/10 (33.4 ov)

WAS won by 8 wickets

Gloucestershire vs Warwickshire

Diamond Oval, Kimberley at Bristol

WAS
WAS

274/10 & 128/10 (38.5 ov)

GLO
GLO

255/10 & 149/7 (48.2 ov)

Gloucs won by 3 wkts

Gloucestershire vs Warwickshire

Diamond Oval, KimberleyGroup A

WAS
WAS

265/2 (38.4 ov)

GLO
GLO

264/10 (48.5 ov)

WAS won by 8 wkts (68b rem)

Gloucestershire vs Birmingham Bears

Diamond Oval, KimberleyCentral Group

WAS
WAS

123/10 (17.1 ov)

GLO
GLO

173/6 (20 ov)

Gloucs won by 50 runs

Birmingham Bears vs Gloucestershire

Diamond Oval, KimberleyCentral Group

WAS
WAS

100/10 (11.1 ov)

GLO
GLO

157/3 (12 ov)

Gloucs won by 57 runs

Gloucestershire vs Warwickshire

Diamond Oval, KimberleyCentral Group

WAS
WAS

247/10 & 160/9 (60 ov)

GLO
GLO

210/10 & 275/10 (95 ov)

Gloucs won by 78 runs

Warwickshire vs Gloucestershire

Diamond Oval, Kimberley

WAS
WAS

277/10 (87.4 ov)

GLO
GLO

127/10 & 103/10 (31 ov)

Bears won by an innings and 47 runs

Team Comparison (Last 10 matches)

WAS

vs all teams

GLO

vs all teams

10

Matches Played

10

40.00%

Win %

50.00%

160

Average Score

146

226

Highest Score

206

39

Lowest Score

93

What are you looking for?

Loading...

Loading...