Wellington Women vs Central Hinds, 22nd Match, Cricket Score

Women's Super Smash, 2023

Result

109/7 (20 ov)

109/10 (19 ov)

Match Tie

Date13 Jan 2024, Fri, 5:00 AM IST

LocationBasin Reserve

TossWB-W won the toss & elected to bat

UmpiresT Semmens (New Zealand), Glen Walklin (New Zealand), Derek Walker (New Zealand, TV)

Match RefereeK Pulley (New Zealand)

Team Form (Last 5 matches)

Head to Head(Last 10 matches)

Wellington Blaze vs Central Hinds

Diamond Oval, Kimberley10th Match

WB-W
WB-W

114/2 (15.1 ov)

CH-W
CH-W

113/10 (19.4 ov)

WB-W won by 8 wickets

Central Hinds vs Wellington Blaze

Diamond Oval, Kimberley7th Match

WB-W
WB-W

114/8 (20 ov)

CH-W
CH-W

89/10 (19 ov)

WB-W won by 25 runs.

Wellington Blaze vs Central Hinds

Diamond Oval, KimberleyMatch 5

WB-W
WB-W

132/10 (33 ov)

CH-W
CH-W

107/10 (41.4 ov)

WB-W won by 25 runs.

Wellington Blaze vs Central Hinds

Diamond Oval, KimberleyMatch 2

WB-W
WB-W

100/10 (31.5 ov)

CH-W
CH-W

141/10 (40.4 ov)

CH-W won by 41 runs.

Wellington Blaze vs Central Hinds

Diamond Oval, KimberleyMatch 22

WB-W
WB-W

271/6 (50 ov)

CH-W
CH-W

247/10 (48.4 ov)

WB-W won by 24 runs.

Wellington Blaze vs Central Hinds

Diamond Oval, KimberleyMatch 19

WB-W
WB-W

244/7 (50 ov)

CH-W
CH-W

213/8 (46.4 ov)

WB-W won by 13 runs. (D/L method)

Wellington Women vs Central Hinds

Diamond Oval, KimberleyFinal

WB-W
WB-W

89/10 (17 ov)

CH-W
CH-W

88/5 (17 ov)

WB-W won by 1 runs.

Wellington Women vs Central Hinds

Diamond Oval, Kimberley22nd Match

WB-W
WB-W

109/7 (20 ov)

CH-W
CH-W

109/10 (19 ov)

Match Tie

Central Hinds vs Wellington Women

Diamond Oval, Kimberley17th Match

WB-W
WB-W

132/2 (19 ov)

CH-W
CH-W

131/4 (20 ov)

WB-W won by 8 wickets

Central Hinds vs Wellington Blaze

Diamond Oval, KimberleyMatch 29

WB-W
WB-W

220/2 (35.2 ov)

CH-W
CH-W

218/9 (50 ov)

WB-W won by 8 wickets

Team Comparison (Last 10 matches)

WB-W

vs all teams

CH-W

vs all teams

10

Matches Played

10

80.00%

Win %

50.00%

122

Average Score

118

159

Highest Score

151

89

Lowest Score

79

What are you looking for?

Loading...

Loading...